Community reactions
This page summarizes public posts on X between Oct 26 and Oct 28 2026 about the transactions. Selection method: public search for posts about the marketplace and the transactions, read without logging in to any account. It is a small, non-representative sample. Each post is attributed by public handle, date (UTC) and link, and quotes are short. Opinions in these posts belong to their authors. We have not verified their claims, and listing a post is not endorsement.
We did not feature posts that name or identify an individual as responsible, that allege theft or fraud by a named or unnamed person without proof, that contain threats or personal information, or that are automatically generated. Several posts of those kinds were seen and left out.
Themes
- Holders reporting affected items and tracing the transactions themselves. Several holders posted that listed items were moved and shared transaction details.
- Requests for an official statement. Multiple posts addressed to the project’s account ask for an explanation. As of Oct 28 2026 we did not find one (status log).
- Expressions of trust and hope for reimbursement. Some holders said they trust the team or hope affected holders are reimbursed.
- Caution about attribution. At least one post said it is not known who is behind the transfers.
- Frustration. Several posts expressed frustration at the lack of a public response. We summarize these here and do not reproduce them.
Selected posts
| Account | Date (UTC) | What it says |
|---|---|---|
| @realXRPL | 2026-10-27 | A holder reports that one of their items was moved on Oct 26 in a batched transaction using 0x82 signatures, and gives the inscription ID. |
| @KillerWhaleHbar | 2026-10-27 | A holder reports a similar loss and shares their own trace: six transactions, 264 items from 194 wallets, every input using 0x82. Our counts match these figures (scale and value). |
| @Star_crystal___ | 2026-10-27 | Replies “Hopefully the people in charge who made the site reimburse them all.” |
| @BillyXBT | 2026-10-27 | “Asking questions after 200+ holders got drained isn’t hate.” The post also makes claims about other marketplaces and the signature type; see comparison for what we could verify. |
| @TurboMetaX | 2026-10-27 | Says their wallet was completely drained and that they trust the team: “We will run it back.” |
| @Heimdall_Bull | 2026-10-27 | Cautions that it is not known who is behind the transfers. |
| @GambitMeta | 2026-10-27 | Describes it as looking like an exploit, says affected items appeared to be “bought” for nothing, and hopes it gets addressed. |
| @HNmetax | 2026-10-27 | Asks why the project’s leaders have said nothing, and says over 200 dogs were affected. |
| @pistolpete_sol | 2026-10-28 | Asks the project’s account whether it will address the marketplace incident. |
We also saw a post on Oct 28 asking the project account about the lack of mention of the incident on its website (@MrSilly_eth, 2026-10-28). The tone was critical; we summarize it under theme 5.
Posts by the project’s own accounts
We read the public timelines of the project’s official account and of the accounts of people associated with it on Oct 28 2026. We did not find a post about the Oct 26 transactions. Details and limits of that check are in the status log. A search can miss posts, deleted posts, replies, private groups and other platforms.
Note
This page does not endorse any claim made in the posts. Claims about who is responsible are not supported by public evidence and are explained on what we cannot know.